Development of Bioethics in International Law as a Global Platform for Solving Human Rights Problems
Abstract
The development of bioethics as a new ethical direction, which arose as a result of scientific and technological progress in biology and medicine in the second half of the XX century and its further integration into the international legal order, including the area of human rights thanks to the leading role of UNESCO and the Council of Europe, is examined in the article. The importance of the 1997 Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine and the 2005 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which laid the foundations of bioethics as a component of international human rights law, was emphasized. The role of the soft law norms as an important source of international law for solving relevant bioethical issues, in particular related to human rights and biomedicine, has been researched. The purpose. The etymology and content of the concept of bioethics as a multidisciplinary ethical doctrine, which, depending on the context, can be interpreted in a narrow or broad sense, are disclosed. The narrow meaning concerns purely ethical dimension of bioethics as a sub-branch of ethics, which explores all ethical problems that arise in the context of life sciences, particularly in biology and medicine, and therefore proceeding from this position, bioethics is interpreted as a philosophical science (part of ethics). The transformation of ideas about bioethics occurred from the point of view of it as the science, which aims to identify certain priorities based on ethical values, that are closely related to biological facts, as well as to clarify or solve ethical issues that arise in the process of development and application of biomedical technologies, for example, in the context of «dual-use technologies» application. The origin of bioethics is often associated not only with moral philosophy, but also with medical ethics, including consideration of four basic principles of biomedical ethics: respect for human autonomy, harmlessness, charity, and justice. The analysis of the peculiarities of European bioethics formation is characterized by universalization of ethical principles, widening of the subject of bioethics from biomedical issues to the global problems of mankind, raising it to the level of metaethics and international biolaw. The formation of bioethical law took place on the basis of close relationship between ethics and law, as well as the development of bioethics in the law. Methodology. The study of the problems of the ethics of life has found its expression in bioethics, as a result of the evolution of which, certain conceptual approaches were formed: from the «science of survival» of all living things, through biomedical ethics) to European bioethics and biolaw. The general development and historical transformations of bioethics can be presented in the form of logical sequence: ethics – bioethics – bioethics in law – biolaw. Scientific novelty. It is argued that soft law has become an important source of international law for addressing pressing human rights issues, including bioethical issues related to biomedicine, environmental protection, etc. Conclusions. Bioethics, aimed at protection of the dignity of a person, his right to life and health, preservation of his physical and mental integrity, respect for his personal autonomy and many related rights, helps to maintain the necessary balance between ethics and law. It sets ethical restrictions on the development of science, referring to moral values that are the boundary between scientifically possible and ethically acceptable to human. The study of important ethical issues raised by bioethics allows at the level of international law to form the platform for large-scale dialogue between states and the gradual achievement of a global consensus in solution of bioethical problems and prevention of their negative consequences.
Keywords: ethics; law; bioethics; international law; human rights; bio-law; scientific and technical progress.
Downloads
References
Audit M. Bioethics and Private International Law. In: Encyclopedia of Private International Law / Edited by J. Basedow, G. Rühl, F. Ferrari, P. de Miguel Asensio. 2017. 4034 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547235.B.8.
Beauchamp T., Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford University Press, 2013. 480 p.
Beauchamp T. L. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics as Universal Principles. Islamic Perspectives on the Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2016. Р. 91–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/9781786340481_0004.
Clados M. C. Bioethics in International Law: An Analysis of the Intertwining of Bioethical and Legal Discourses : Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. München vorgelegt von Mirjam Sophia Clados, aus München, 2012. URL: https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15247/1/Clados_Mirjam_Sophia.pdf.
Faunce T. A. Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2005. No. 31 (3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.006502.
Final Report to the Commission on the Project Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw. URL: http://cometc.unibuc.ro/reglementari/Basic-Ethical-Principles.pdf.
Garcia M., Gamba J., Montal Z. Biodireito Constitucional: Questões Atuais. Elsevier Editora Ltda, 2010.
Growth in United Nations membership, 1945-present. URL: https://www.un.org/en/sections/member-states/growth-united-nations-membership-1945-present/index.html.
Hottois G., Parizeau M.-H. (Eds.). Les mots de la bioéthique. Un vocabulaire encyclopédique. De Boeck Université : Bruxelle, 1993.
Kemp P. Bioethics in Law and Biolaw in Ethics. In Bioethics and Biolaw / P. Kemp, J. Rendtorff, N. Mattsson Johanssen (Ed.). Copenhagen : Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers and Centre for Ethics and Law, 2000. 313 p. Vol. I : Judgement of Life.
Островська Б. В. Біоетичні принципи як утвердження в міжнародному праві нового рівня захисту прав людини. Юридичний часопис Національної академії внутрішніх справ. 2018. № 2 (16). С. 38–54. URL: https://lawjournal.naiau.kiev.ua/index.php/lawjournal/article/view/901.
Pavone I. R. The role of soft law in bioethics. International Biolaw and Shared Ethical Principles. 2018. Р. 99–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315589312-9.
Potter V. Bioethics. Bridge to the Future. New York : Prentice Hall, 1971. 205 p.
Proclamation of Teheran, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 22 April to 13 May 1968, U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 32/41 at 3 (1968). URL: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/SRHRL/PDF/IHRDArticle15/ Proclamation_of_Teheran_Eng.pdf.
Пустовит С. Биомедицинская этика Т. Бочампа и Дж. Чилдресса. Практична філософія. 2008. № 2 (28). С. 63–72.
Пустовіт С. Філософсько-методологічний аналіз передумов, засад та принципів біоетики : автореф. дис. ... д-ра філос. наук :12.00.12. Київ, 2009. 39 c.
Pustovit S. V., Williams E. Philosophical use of dual-use technologies. Science and engineering ethics. 2010. No. 16 (1). P. 17–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9086-1.
Rendtorff J. D., Kemp P. Four Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability. Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century / E. Valdés, J. Lecaros (Eds.). International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine. Springer, Cham, 2019. Vol. 78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_3.
Тарахонич Т., Тарахонич О. Біоетичні проблеми: теоретично-правовий аспект. Вісник НАН України. 2002. № 1. С. 41–43.
The WMA International Code of Medical Ethics. URL: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-international-code-of-medical-ethics.
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. URL: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna on 25 June 1993. URL: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/vienna.aspx.
WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
Задорожній О. В. Нові тенденції в правовому регулюванні новітніх біомедичних досліджень: досвід зарубіжних країн та України. Актуальні проблеми європейської інтеграції. 2012. № 8. С. 100–110.
Abstract views: 885 PDF Downloads: 1273
Copyright (c) 2020 Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.