Philosophical Dimension of Government Legitimacy During the Period Of Existential War: the Experience of Ukraine in the XX–XXI Centuries

  • Myroslav DURDYNETS

    PhD in Law, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

    Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-3583
  • Bohdan DRAPIATYI

    Postgraduate Student of the Department of Constitutional Law and Local Self-Government of the Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretsky

    Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8360-498X

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of the article is to use the example of Ukrainian statehood to carry out a doctrinal analysis of the nature of the legitimacy of Ukrainian power and its factors during the period of Russia's permanent existential war against Ukraine, both in historical retrospect and with a political and legal analysis in the conditions of martial law. The methodological basis of the research is based on general scientific and special legal methods. The key is an axiological approach using comparative law, historical, epistemological, content analysis, dialectical and other methods of scientific research. The scientific novelty consists in the philosophical and legal reflection and development of specific proposals regarding the further legal and organizational improvement of the work of state institutions, strengthening the legitimacy of the government in the conditions of permanent threats from the historical enemy of Ukraine – the Russian Federation. An analysis of the nature of the legitimacy of the government in the conditions of martial law and historical retrospect with modeling of future challenges based on the political and legal experience of Ukrainian state-building was carried out. The main factors of the legitimacy of the government in a democratic society are recognized as the level of trust in the electoral system and the turnout of voters, the quality of laws and other normative acts (compliance of the written norm with the real possibility of its enforcement), a politically impartial and professional state apparatus, the stability and uninterrupted work of institutions during the period of the special legal regime martial law or state of emergency, the level of public trust in state institutions, compliance of government actions with the norms of the Constitution of Ukraine and the achievement of legitimate goals of their implementation. The practical significance of the study of the outlined issues lies in the possibility of developing the most effective models of political forecasting and state-building

 

Keywords: legitimacy; constitutionalism; power; democracy; war; martial law; sovereignty; philosophy; state institutions; policy; parliament; state formation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Myroslav DURDYNETS

PhD in Law, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

Kyiv, Ukraine

Bohdan DRAPIATYI

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Constitutional Law and Local Self-Government of the Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretsky

Kyiv, Ukraine

References

30 років тому. Референдум 1991 року про незалежність України і розпад СРСР (архівні фото). URL: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/referendum-pershoho-hrudnia-1991-roku-pro-nezalezhnist-ukrayiny-arkhivni-foto/30287132.html.

Арон Р. Опій інтелектуалів. Київ : Юніверс, 2006. 272 с.

Bellamy R. Political Constitutionalism and Populism. Journal of Law and Society. 2022. P. 1–25. doi: 10.1111/jols.12401.

Dellmuth L., Aart Scholte J., Tallberg J., Verhaegen S. Legitimacy in Global Governance. Chapter 1. Citizens, Elites, and the Legitimacy of Global Governance. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2022. P. 3–24.

Koch C. Varieties of populism and the challenges to Global Constitutionalism: Dangers, promises

and implications. Global Constitutionalism. 2021. Vol. 10. Issue 3. P. 400–438. doi: 10.1017/S2045381719000455.

Костицький М. В. Ключові підходи до методології пізнання української історико-правової дійсності. Науково-інформаційний вісник. 2015. № 12. С. 12–17. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Nivif_2015_12_3.pdf.

Mazzoleni O., Voerman G. In the Name of Sovereignty. Right-Wing Populism and the Power of the Judiciary in Western Europe. Partecipazione e Conflitto. University of Salento (Italy). 2021. Vol. 13. No. 3. doi: 10.1285/i20356609v13i3p1417.

Mudde C., Kaltwasser C. Populism: a very short introduction. New York : Oxford University Press, 2017. 52 р.

Pike J. The law does not exist to guide us. Jurisprudence : An International Journal of Legal

and Political Thought. Routledge. 2023. Vol. 14. Issue 1. P. 95–112. doi: 10.1080/20403313.2022.2141509.

Верховенство права : доповідь, схвалена Венеційською Комісією на 86-му пленарному засіданні (Венеція, 25–26 берез. 2011 р.). URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/CDL_AD_2011_003_ rev_2011_04_04.pdf.

Tushnet M., Bugaric B. Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism. Oxford University Press, 2021. 294 p.

Трансформація партійної системи: український довід у європейському контексті / за ред. Ю. Якименка. Київ : Центр Разумкова, 2017. 381 с.


Abstract views: 180
PDF Downloads: 160
Published
2023-07-19
Section
Philosophy and philosophy of law