Two-Chamber Parliament as a Form of Democratic Power in Ukraine: Historical-Legal Analysis and Prospects
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to make the systematized presentation of the history and prospects of the introduction of bicameralism in Ukraine. To this end, the article provides a philosophical and legal analysis of the historical development of the theoretical justification and practice of implementing the institution of a bicameral parliament in Ukraine. Methodology. The key methodological approach in the study is axiological. The comparative method allowed us to analyze discussions about the positive and weaknesses of bicameralism, as well as the possibility of introducing it in Ukraine. The historical and legal method allowed us to consider the origins and evolution of bicameralism in individual countries of Europe, the USA and Ukraine. Scientific novelty. The article contains the multidimensional comparative analysis of procedures of judicial argumentation and logical proving, that are characterized not only with certain similarity but also with some specific moments. Author states that European parliamentarism is based on democratic values – legal succession, civil liberties, priority of human rights, political and cultural pluralism, strong civil society taking into consideration that parliamentarism and bicameralism are usually linked to democratic political and legal culture. It is stressed on importance of urgent implementation of best foreign practices related to bicameral parliament functioning as this concept has become the crucial factor of parliamentarism and constitutionalism evolution. Ukrainian choice to follow the European path of state development is impossible to reach without proper consideration of relevant legislative provisions. Key advantages and disadvantages of bicameralism are demonstrated on the basis of comparison of modern bicameral parliaments functioning (special attention is paid to formation procedure and upper chambers authorities). It is proved that the perspectives of bicameral parliament establishment in Ukraine depend not only on political and legal factors but also on the legal philosophical and psychological aspects. Author states that structure of Ukrainian parliament is of crucial importance when it comes to consideration of needs and interests of all society groups and categories, harmonization of authority and community interaction with aim to ensure its democratic development, achievement of certain level of sustainability in executive and legislative power branches cooperation, favourable conditions establishment for state power key components functioning and consolidated decisions to be made in this specific area to increase the quality of law-making process. It is stressed that attention must be paid to promotion of territorial communities development in Ukraine by ensuring opportunity to represent certain interests in state higher legislative body. Conclusions: It is noted that well-defined structure of the parliament will allow to represent interests of all regions and territorial communities with perspective to stimulate economic growth and consolidate society for implementation of vital policies and strategies to strengthen Ukraine’s potential and national security.
Кeywords: bicameralism; parliamentarism; Ukrainian state building; democratic values; European integration.
Downloads
References
Albala A. Bicameralism and Coalition Cabinets in Presidential Polities: A configurational analysis of the coalition formation and duration processes. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2017. No. 19 (4). P. 735–754. doi: 10.1177/1369148117727440.
Albala A. Corrigendum: Bicameralism and Coalition Cabinets in Presidential Polities: A configurational analysis of the coalition formation and duration processes. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2019. Vol. 21. Issue 2. P. 459–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119846483.
Albert R. The challenge of reforming bicameralism. Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures : Monograph Book. 2019. P. 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00006.
Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures. Bicameralism under Pressure : Monograph Book / Edited by R. Albert, A. Baraggia, C. Fasone. 2019. 320 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.
Bradbury J., Crain M. Bicameral Legislatures and Fiscal Policy. Southern Economic Journal. 2002. No. 3. Vol. 68. P. 646–659.
Дурдинець М. Ю. Генезис бікамералізму в європейській культурі. Філософські та методологічні проблеми права. 2017. № 1 (13). С. 41–48. URL: https://philosophy.naiau.kiev.ua/index.php/philosophy/article/view/349.
Fasone C. Concluding chapter – Unicameralism and masked bicameralism. Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures : Monograph Book. 2019. P. 183–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00018.
Костицький М. В. Філософські та психологічні проблеми юриспруденції : наук. пр. Чернівці : Рута, 2008. 560 с.
Костицький М. В. Про математику як методологію пізнання (зокрема, в психології). Юридична психологія та педагогіка. 2014. № 1. С. 3–11.
Llanos M., Nolte D. Bicameralism in the Americas: Around the Extremes of Symmetry and Incongruence. Тhe Journal of Legislative Studies. 2003. No. 3. Vol. 9. Р. 54–86.
Meg R. Foreword: Bicameralism in an age of populism. Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures : Monograph Book. 2019. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00005.
Павлишин О. В. Правова реальність як знакова система : монографія. Харків : Право, 2017. 336 с.
Popelier P. Concluding chapter – Bicameralism in multi-tiered systems. Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures : Monograph Book. 2019. P. 107–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00013.
Romaniello M. Bicameralism. Multiple theoretical roots in diverging practices. Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures : Monograph Book. 2019. P. 16–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00008.
Rubinelli L. Sieyès versus Bicameralism. The Review of Politics. 2019. Vol. 81. Issue 2. P. 255–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670518001201.
Serra D. Defending bicameralism and equalising powers: The case of Peru. Constitutional Reform of National Legislatures : Monograph Book. 2019. P. 142–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00016.
Vercesi M. Democratic Stress and Political Institutions: Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis. Representation. 2019. P. 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195.
Wolfs W., Cigala C. The scrutiny of EU documents in bicameral systems: Opportunity or weakness? : Monograph Book. Law, 2019. P. 76–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978644.00011.
Abstract views: 369 PDF Downloads: 433
Copyright (c) 2020 Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
