Worldview Level Visions of Transformation of Judicial Proceedings in Ukraine
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to determine the patterns of formation of the outlook of judges and the domestic judicial system as a whole in the process of transformation of domestic justice, from the point of view of philosophical-theoretical dimensions, because, as the results of the study of empirical material show, certain aspects of judicial activity in the context of the philosophical substantiation of between the outlook of the judge and the process of forming his legal thinking, remains poorly understood. To achieve this goal the author plans to solve the following problems: to study the axiological and ontological aspects of the formation of judges’ outlook and their influence on the process of reforming the domestic judicial system; identify current trends in the transformation of the judicial system, taking into account foreign experience, as well as customs, traditions and mentality of the population of Ukrainian lands. Methodology. During the research methodological tools were used, the basis of which was historical, comparative, sociological, logical-legal, hermeneutic, as well as other methods of science of philosophy of law. The scientific novelty of the study is determined by the fact that certain aspects of judicial activity in the context of the philosophical substantiation of the obviousness of the systemic relationship between the judge’s worldview and the process of shaping his legal thinking, taking into account the traditions, customs and mentality of the autochthonous Ukrainian people, in our opinion, are still poorly studied. According to the research, the author draws some conclusions, which are as follows: 1. The philosophical and legal foundations of the formation of the outlook of the modern Ukrainian judge and the domestic judiciary as a whole should be based on the recognition and implementation of the principle of the rule of law when combining the positivist approach to the assessment of the circumstances of the trial, with the axiological understanding of the freedoms of primacy, honours and dignity of the individual, equality in rights and before the law, etc.), as well as ontological dimensions, that is, taking into account the impact of the decision on the social, cultural, moral and ethical and other factors of life of society. 2. The worldview of the modern domestic servant of Themis is a reasonable balance of normative regulation of solving social problems and principles of anthropocentrism, according to which, based on the customs, traditions and mentality of the population of Ukrainian lands, man is a self-sufficient individual, whose value is freedom and autonomy.
Keywords: anthropocentrism; universal values; positivism; outlook; judiciary; judge.
Downloads
References
Акімов О. О. Професійна діяльність державних службовців в умовах євроінтеграції України: питання формування психологічної готовності : монографія. Київ : Центр учб. літ., 2014. 176 с.
Философский энциклопедический словарь / редкол.: С. С. Аверинцев, Э. А. Араб-Оглы, Л. Ф. Ильичев и др.
-е изд. М. : Сов. Энциклопедия, 1989. 815 с.
Berger P. L. The Supreme Court Celebrates the Bicentennial. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 1976. Vol. 19. Issue 9. P. 27–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0084255900034604.
Cintron E. J. Transformation: the Progression of Immigration Petitions for Transgender Spouses. Student Note for the Special Issue: 26 October 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01485.
An Overview of worldview / editor J. Finn. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 1971. Vol. 14. Issue 1.
P. 3–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0084255900011955.
Fridman S. Enabling agency: the Constitutional Court and social policy. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa Transformation. View Citation Additional Information. 2016. Vol. 91. P. 19–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2016.0016.
Геґель Ґ. В. Ф. Феноменологія духу / пер. з нім. П. Таращук. Київ : Основи, 2004. 548 с
Сучасне управління в суді : навч.-практ. посіб. / відп. ред. І. П. Голосніченко, П. Г. Соломон. Київ : Юрінком Інтер, 2010. 528 с.
Кант. І. Критика чистого розуму / пер. з нім. І. Бурковського. Київ : Юніверс, 2000. 504 с.
Світогляд і світ людини : колективна монографія / за заг. ред. В. П. Капітона. Дніпропетровськ : ДДФА, 2008. 240 с.
Кодекс суддівської етики (Затверджено XI черговим з’їздом суддів України 22 лют. 2013 р.). Вісник Верховного суду України. 2013. № 3. Стор. 27.
Костицький М. В. Логіка як методологія наукового пізнання (зокрема в правознавстві). Філософські та методологічні проблеми права. 2014. № 1. С. 3–13.
Максимов С. И. Правовая реальность: опыт философского осмысления : монография. Xарьков : Право, 2002. 327 с.
Marshall C. B. Justice and the International Court. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 1966. Vol. 9. Issue 10. P. 7–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0084255900008597.
Rennie E. M. The International Criminal Court: A court without a state? A transformation from state-centered governance to non-state-centered governance? University of Northern British Columbia Institutional Repository. 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.24124/2006/bpgub401.
Рішення Конституційного Суду України у справі за конституційним поданням Верховного Суду України щодо відповідності Конституції України (конституційності) положень статті 69 Кримінального кодексу України (справа про призначення судом більш м’якого покарання) : рішення КСУ від 2 листоп. 2004 с.
№ 15-рп/2004. Офіційний вісник України. 2004. № 45. Стор. 41. Ст. 2975.
Stefon F. Pannenberg’s Worldview-a reply. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 1972. Vol. 15. Issue 12. P. 56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0084255900019203.
Songer D. R. Acknowledgments. The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination
(XIII–XIV). Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689473-002.
Про судоустрій та статус суддів : Закон України від 2 черв. 2016 р. № 1402-VIII. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 2016. № 31. Ст. 545.
Abstract views: 113 PDF Downloads: 196
Copyright (c) 2020 Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.