Digitalization in Modern Judicial Procedure

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze and identify the features of the «digital court» as phenomena generated by modern information and digital culture; how that judicial activity and judicature are no exception. The methodological basis of the article is a set of methodological approaches and systems of philosophical and general scientific methods. Determinants are the method of dialectics, comparative and hermeneutic, and also constructivism and anthropology as methodological approaches. Scientific novelty.The article analyzes the changes in the domestic legal proceedings, due to the spread and application of digital technologies in all areas of social life. It is pointed out that advances in digital technologies are now being introduced in such a phenomenon as «digital court», the operation of which should improve access to justice. In modern law enforcement also presents the processes of automation and algorithms, the use of which involves the use of robots and artificial intelligence. Conclusions. Digitalization as a modern phenomenon permeates all spheres of social life. Digitization is the element of the third and fourth industrial revolution, which «work» in the field of law enforcement, in particular in litigation.

Keywords: law enforcement; legal text; digitalization; digitalization; litigation, e-court; industrial revolution; algorithmization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. Rudiuk

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Philosophy of Law an Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Дорская А. А.,.Дорский А. Ю. Официальная политика памяти всовременной России: юридическое измерение. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета.2018. № 2. С. 124–138. (Серия «Право»). doi: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.201.

Фрончко В. До питання про цифрову юриспруденцію. Актуальні проблеми правознавства. 2019. Вип. 2 (18). C. 144–148.

Краснов Є. «Електронний суд» потребує не лише технологічного вдосконалення, а й правового. URL: http://rsu.gov.ua/ua/news/egor-krasnov-elektronnij-sud-potrebue-ne-lise-tehnologicnogo-vdoskonalenna-a-j-pravovogo.

Моисеева А. А. Условия и последствия диджитализации современного общества: социально-экономический анализ. Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017. № 39. С. 216–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863ɏ/39/24.

Пашенцев Д. А., Алимова Д. Р. Новации правотворчества в условиях цифровизации общественных отношений. Государство и право. 2019. № 6. C. 102–106. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.31857/S013207690005265-3.

Пашенцев Д. А. Особенности правоприменения в условиях цифровизации общественных отношений. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. 2020. № 1. С. 35–49. (Серия «Право»). doi: https://doi.org/doi.org/ 10.21638/spbu14.2020.103.

Ракитина Л. Дистанционный судебный процесс и обеспечение иска. URL: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/44100-distancionnyj-sudebnyj-process-espechenie-iska.

Riordan M., Hoddeson L., Narayanamurti V. Crystal fire: The birth of the information age. Physics Today. 1998. T. 51. 64 р.

Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business. 2017. 172 р.

Васильєв С. В. Цивільний процес : підручник. Київ : Алерта, 2019. 506 с.

Vovk V., Kaljuzhnyj R. The rights of ingumans: philosophical and outline education. EURÓPSKA VEDA. Vedecký časopis. Vedecký časopis. 2019. No. 3. P. 105–109.


Abstract views: 435
PDF Downloads: 1273
Published
2021-04-05
Section
Law and Politics