Legal Bases of the Contaminated Model International Criminal Justice
Abstract
The article analyzes the legal and institutional principles of formation and activity of international criminal judicial bodies, which are related to the contaminated (mixed) model of international justice, which are of great scientific and practical interest. The purpose of the article is to determine on the basis of international legal acts, judicial practice and scientific achievements of legal and institutional principles of formation and operation of international criminal contaminated courts, features of their legal status, jurisdiction and judicial activity. The methodological basis of the article is the use of philosophical, general and special scientific methods, among which the fundamental are dialectical, comparative law, system-structural, hermeneutic, anthropological methods. The scientific novelty is that the study of the legal and institutional foundations of the formation and operation of contaminated courts in the field of international criminal justice in Ukraine is carried out for the first time. Conclusions. Coverage of the nature and features of the legal and institutional framework for the formation and operation of international criminal contaminated courts plays an important role in the fight against international crime, peace and international security. The application of a contaminated model of international criminal justice helps to increase the effectiveness of combating international crime.
Keywords: international criminal judicial body; contaminated model; legal bases; institutional base; international crimes.
Downloads
References
Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone (Jan. 16, 2002)/2178 U.N.T.S. 137.
Базов. О. В. Розвиток правових та інституційних засад діяльності Спеціалізованих судових палат і Спеціалізованої прокуратури по Косово. Наукові записки Інституту законодавства Верховної Ради України. 2021. № 5. С. 6–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.32886/10.32886/instzak.2021.05.01.
Beccaria C. On Crimes and Punishments / R. Bellamy (Ed.). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1995. 236 p.
Buromenskiy M., Gutnyk V. Problemas jurídicos internacionales de calificación de los conflictos armados. Cuestiones Políticas. 2021. No. 39 (68). Р. 735–757. URL: https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/35447. doi: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3968.47.
Cassese A. International Criminal Law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003. 472 p.
Cassese A. International Criminal Law. 2nd edn. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008. Р. 4.
Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. AS/Jur (2010) 46 from December 12, 2010.
Damgaard C. Individual Criminal Responsibility for Core International Crimes: Selected Pertinent Issues. Berlin : Springer, 2008. 456 p.
Doc. UN S/RES/1757 (2007), 30 May 2007; S//RES/1664(2006); S/RES/1757 (2007), 30 May 2007.
Доповідь Генерального секретаря ООН від 26 лип. 2010 р. Док. ООН S/2010/394.
Доповідь Генерального секретаря про створення Спеціального Суду по Сьєрра-Леоне : док. ООН: S/2000/915. New York UN, 2000. 35 p.
Hartley T. The Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010. 188 р.
Гутник В. В.Проблеми права війни у наукових працях Херша Лаутерпахта. Філософські та методологічні проблеми права. 2021. № 1 (21). С. 54–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/02212101.54.
Гвоздік О. Критерії достатності доказів. Філософські та методологічні проблеми права. 2019. № 2 (18). С. 63–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/02191802.63.
Judgment Constitutional Court of Kosovo in Case No. KO26/(note54). P. 37.
Камінська Н., Акімов М. Відповідальність держави за знищення цивільних повітряних суден: особливості міжнародно-правового та національного регулювання. Вісник Луганського державного університету внутрішніх справ імені Е. О. Дідоренка. 2020 № 3 (91). С. 89–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.33766/2524-0323.91.89-101.
Кононенко В. П. Доказування в міжнародному суді ООН. Правова держава. 2018. № 32. С. 176–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.18524/2411-2054.2018.32.149585.
Kosovo: Rape as a Weapon of Ethnic Cleansing. Human Rights Watch. March 1, 2000. D1203. URL: https://refworld.org/docid/3ae6a87a0.html.
Koumjian, N. (2004). Accomplishments and Limitations of one Hybrid Tribunal: Experience in East Timor, in Guest Lecture Series of the Office of the Prosecutor. 2004. URL: https://www2.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/1f90cbbc-08e8-4acd-91ee-f49ad93ed86a/0/Koumjianpresentation140404.pdf.
Кравченко І. М. Правовий статус «військовополонений» та «цивільний заручник» у розумінні норм міжнародного гуманітарного права з огляду на проведення операції Об’єднаних Сил (АТО) на сході України. Науковий вісник Національної академії внутрішніх справ. 2020. № 1 (114). С. 137–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/01201141.137.
Amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo : Law of Kosovo from August 3, 2015, No. 05-D-139. URL: https://gzk.rks-gov.net.
On Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutors Office : Law of Kosovo No. 05/L-053. URL: https://gzk.rks-gov.net.
Mangu A. M. B. 28 South African Yearbook of International Law. 2003. Р. 238.
Maniscalco F. The Loss of the Kosovo Cultural Heritage. Webjournal. 2006. Vol. 2. P. 21–46.
McDonald A. Sierra Leones Shoestring Special Court. International Review of the Red Cross. 2002. Vol. 84. No. 845. P. 121–143.
Meisenberg S. M. Legality of Amnesties in International Law. The Lome Amnesty Decision of the Special Court for Sierra Leone. International Review of the Red Cross. 2004. Vol. 86. No. 856. P. 837–851.
Parmentier S.Global Justice in the Aftermath of Mass Violence. The Role of the International Criminal Court m Dealing with Political Crimes. International Annals of Criminology. 2003. No. 41 (1-2). P. 203–224.
Perriello T., Wierda M. The Special Court for Sierra Leone Under Security.New York : International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006. Р. 4–9.
President of the Republic of Sierra Leone, Annex to the Letter dated Aug. 9, 2000 from the Permanent Representative of Sierra Leone to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council. U.N. Doc. S/2000/786 (Aug. 10, 2000).
Пронюк Н. В. Сучасне міжнародне право : навч. посіб. Київ : КНТ, 2010. 280 с.
Prosecutor v. Ch. G. Taylor. Appeals Chamber Decision on 31 May 2004.
Reiger C., Wierda M. The Serious Crimes Process in Timor-Leste: In Retrospect. New York : International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006. 41 p.
Resolution 1244 (1999) RB OON Dokument OON S/RES/1244 (1999).
Resolution 1315 (2000) RB OON 14.08.2000. Dok. OON: S/RES/1315(2000). New York : UN, 2000. 3 p.
Resolution 1543 (2004) RB OON. URL: https://un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/351/40/PDF/N0435140.pdf.
Resolution 1664 (2006) RB OON. URL: https://un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/351/40/PDF/N0435140.pdf.
Resolution 1757 (2007) RB OON. URL: https://stl-tsl.org/en/documents/un-documents/security-council-resolution-1757.
Resolution No. 955 from November 1994. URL: https://undocs.org/S/RES/955(1994).
Romano C.Mixed Jurisdictions for East Timor, Kosovo, Sierra Leone and Cambodia: The Coming of Age of Internationalized Criminal Bodies? The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence. 2002. V. 2. P. 97–138.
Шаптала Н. Аксіологічна складова доказування в конституційному судовому процесі. Юридичний часопис Національної академії внутрішніх справ. 2019. № 1 (17). С. 7–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/04191701.7.
Sierra Leone Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996, 1997. United States Department of State. URL: https://state.gov/www/global/human_rights/1996_hrp_report/sierrale.html.
Статут Міжнародного суду ООН. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/statute-of-the-court/statute-of-the-court-ru.pdf.
Статут Спеціального суду : документ ООН S/2002/246, March 8, 2002.
UNTAET/REG/2000/11, 6 March 2000 UN Transitional Administration of East Timor. No. 2000/15. URL: https://un.org/peace/etimor/untaetR/reg11.pdf.
UNTAET/REG/2000/15, 6 June 2000. UN Transitional Administration of East Timor. Electronic data (1 file). URL: https://un.org/peace/etimor/untaetR/reg0015E.pdf.
Yuskiv B., KhomychS. The role of media propaganda in the «hybrid war». Actual problems of international relations. 2017. No. 132. doi: https://doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2017.132.0.27-43.
Волеводз А. Г. Международное уголовное правосудие: от идеи к современной системе. Вестник МГИМО. 2009. № 2. С. 55–68.
Щербань Є., Камінська Н. Деякі питання імплементації Римського статуту про Міжнародний кримінальний суд. Науковий вісник Національної академії внутрішніх справ. 2020. № 2 (115). С. 138–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/01201152.138.
Abstract views: 170 PDF Downloads: 355
Copyright (c) 2022 Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
