The Influence of Post-Truth on Judicial Judgment: Past, Present, Future
Abstract
Abstract. The rapid development of the information society, as the era of rapid access to information, has not only advantages, but also disadvantages. One of these shortcomings is the phenomenon of post-truth – the truth taken on faith (without checking the veracity of the facts). One of these shortcomings is the phenomenon of post-truth – the truth taken on faith (without checking the veracity of the facts). In the age of the Internet, this phenomenon develops in a geometric progression and every day it becomes closer to different segments of the population, organizations and groups. At that time, no matter how much the judiciary proclaimed its independence and striking changes as a result of the next reform, the influence on the inner conviction of the judge (judicial discretion) from the side of public opinion, certain cultural or political narratives, or general opinion (including on the Internet) was, is, and obviously – every year it will be even more important. Therefore, the author aims in this article to investigate the very phenomenon of post-truth, to find its negative manifestations at the judge’s discretion in the past and present, to determine methods of opposing this phenomenon, and to predict possible consequences in case of inaction in the future. In this article, the author revealed the very concept of post-truth using the methods of analysis, synthesis and generalization, analyzed its formation and development in historical retrospect, and with the help of deductive-logical analysis came to conclusions about the negative impact of post-truth on judicial discretion. Although the concept of post-truth itself is quite young, recently more and more scientists are directing their research in the direction of this topic. However, the impact of post-truth on judicial discretion has not been thoroughly investigated by anyone, especially in the Ukrainian scientific space and its realities. The obtained conclusions give the author reason to come to the opinion that no matter how the judicial branch of government is reformed, the manifestations of the post-truth already today have negative consequences for the judiciary, its influence is constantly growing, and if appropriate conclusions are not drawn and measures are not taken, in the future it may lead to irreparable consequences
Keywords: post-truth; judicial discretion; judiciary; philosophy of law; Internet; information; fake judge
Downloads
References
Адамська-Галлант А. Інтерв’ю журналу «Українське право» від 23 липня 2019 року. URL: https://ukrainepravo.com/judicial_truth/divine_law/suddya-ne-mozhe-vynosyty-rishennya-bazuyuchys-na-ochikuvannyakh-gromadskosti-abo-zasobiv-masovoyi-in.
Байрачна Л. К., Бондар Т. І. Суддівський розсуд як інструмент забезпечення справедливості судочинства. Прикарпатський юридичний вісник. 2021. № 6. С. 22–27. doi: 10.32837/pyuv.v0i6(41).960.
Балух В., Возний І., Коцур В. Історичні портрети античності та середньовіччя : підручник. Чернівці : Книги – ХХІ, 2007. 502 с.
Барак А. Суддівський розсуд. Київ : Центр учб. літ., 2022. 320 с.
Bingham T. The Discretion of the Judge. The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches. Oxford : Oxford Academic Press, 2000. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299127.003.0003.
Cavanagh E. D. Countering the Big Lie: The Role of the Courts in the Post Truth World. Cornelli law review online. 2022. Vol. 107. P. 101–125.
Crouch C. Post-Democracy. First published December 18, 2000. 144 p.
Gennaioli N., Shleifer A. Judicial Fact Discretion. The Journal of Legal Studies. 2008. Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 1–35. doi: 10.1086/588266.
Демиденко Г. Сократ. Велика українська юридична енциклопедія : в 20 т. Харків : Право, 2017. Т. 2 : Філософія права. С. 782‒784.
Калиновський Ю., Жданенко С. Соціокультурний вимір інфодемії в умовах глобальної нестрабільності. Вісник Національного юридичного університету імені Ярослава Мудрого. 2022. № 1 (52). С. 27–46. (Серія «Філософія, філософія права, політологія, соціологія»). doi: 10.21564/2663-5704.52.250418.
Keyes R. The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. St. Martin’s Press, 2004.
Кушакова-Костицька Н. Філософсько-правові засади розвитку інформаційного суспільства в Україні : монографія. Київ : Логос, 2019. 346 с.
Макінтайр Лі. Постправда. Київ : ArtHuss, 2021. 208 с.
Онух. Постправда. Український тиждень. 2016. № 47 (471). URL: https://tyzhden.ua/postpravda.
Oxford Dictionary of English. URL: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/post-truth.
Rees G., White D. Judging Post-Controversy Expertise: Judicial Discretion and Scientific Marginalisation in the Courtroom. Science as Culture. 2023. Vol. 32. Issue 1. P. 109–131. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2114335.
Саноцька Н. Я. Контури постправди в інформаційному суспільстві. Актуальні проблеми філософії та соціології. 2017. Вип. 20. С. 108–111. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11300/11467.
Шевченко А. Суддівський розсуд і суддівське свавілля: межі дозволеного та відповідальність за їх порушення. Вісник кримінального судочинства. 2018. № 3. С. 111–120. URL: https://vkslaw.knu.ua/images/verstka/3_2018_Shevchenko.pdf.
Tesich S. A Government of Lies. The Nation. 1992. January 6–13. Р. 12–15.
«Вплив постправди на суддівський розсуд» – запит чат-боту ChatGTP, розробленої лабораторією OpenAL в месcенджері «Телеграм-каналу». URL: https://t.me/GPT_onlinebot.
Токарська А. С. Сучасна трендова комунікація: реалії правди та постправди. Філософські, методологічні та психологічні проблеми права : матеріали VIII Всеукр. наук.-теорет. конф. (Київ, 26 листоп. 2020 р.). Київ : Нац. акад. внутр. справ, 2020. С. 285–286.
Ванджурак Р. Інтелектуальна традиція давньогрецької філософії права як концептуальна основа української юриспруденції : дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 081. Київ, 2023. 237 с. URL: http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/23114.
Abstract views: 326 PDF Downloads: 149
Copyright (c) 2023 Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
