Philosophical Problems of Law-Making

  • Nataliia KUSHAKOVA-KOSTYTSKA

    Doctor of Law, Professor,

    Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-4751
  • Mykhailo KOSTYTSKYI

    Doctor of Law, Professor, Academic of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

    Chief Researcher of the Department of Public and Legal Research of the Institute
    of Law-Making and Scientific-Legal Expertise of the National Academy
    of Sciences of Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-2513

Abstract

Abstract. The need for a philosophical analysis of law-making is conditioned by the fact that it (law-making) is reduced in jurisprudence (in particular, in the theory of the state and law) exclusively to the activity of the state, while ignoring the participation in this process of subjects of civil society and individual citizens. The statement about law-making as an activity of the state "...with the participation of civil society" but still "in cases provided for by law" is the "most progressive" reasoning in jurisprudence, which is still tied to statism (exaltation of the role of the state). In Ukraine, which has taken a course for the development of the state and law according to the European liberal-democratic model, in the future (especially after the end of the war), the role of the state will inevitably decrease and the role of civil society will increase, especially in the field of law-making. Therefore, the rejection of the monopoly role of the state in this process is a requirement of the time, which should first be implemented at the theoretical level and later put into practice. The reduction of the role of the state in social management with the expansion of self-management will indicate the completion of a certain cycle of the development of society, which lasted approximately from the 7th millennium AD. until recent times. At the same time, law preceded the development of the state, and the state, having fulfilled its function, should leave the historical arena. And law-making, especially such an aspect of it as the growing participation of civil society in this process, is an illustration of the indicated trend.

 

Keywords: law-making; civil society; state; law; statute.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nataliia KUSHAKOVA-KOSTYTSKA

Doctor of Law, Professor,

Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

Mykhailo KOSTYTSKYI

Doctor of Law, Professor, Academic of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

Chief Researcher of the Department of Public and Legal Research of the Institute
of Law-Making and Scientific-Legal Expertise of the National Academy
of Sciences of Ukraine

References

Babii, B.M., Burchak, F.G., & Koretskyi, V.M. (Eds.). (1983). Legal dictionary (2nd, ed.). Kyiv: Holov. red. URE.

Babii, B.M., Koretskyi, V.M., & Tsvietkov, V.V. (Eds.). (1974). Legal dictionary. Kyiv: Holov. red. URE.

Bestock, L. (2017). Violence and Power in Ancient Egypt. Image and Ideology before the New Kingdom. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315543505.

Cotterrell, R. (2023). A socio-legal quest: from jurisprudence to sociology of law and back again. Journal of Law and Society, 50(1), 3-16. doi: 10.1111/jols.12403.

Del Mar, M. (2012). Relational Jurisprudence. Vulnerability between Fact and Value. Law and Method, 2(2), 63-81. doi: 10.5553/ReM/221225082012002002005.

Drinóczi, T., & Cormacain, R. (2021). Introduction: illiberal tendencies in law-making. Theory and Practice of Legislation, 9(3), 269-275. doi: 10.1080/20508840.2021.1955483.

Glassman, R.M. (2017). Democracy in the Sumerian City States: The Assembly, the Elders, and the King. The Origins of Democracy in Tribes, City-States and Nation-States. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51695-0_36.

Gonzalez, W.J. (2010). Trends and Problems in Philosophy of Social and Cultural Sciences: A European Perspective. The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_18.

Jacobsen, Th. (1994). The Historian and the Sumerian Gods. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 114(2), 145-153.

Jaksland, R. (2021). Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(40), 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s13194-021-00427-9.

Kant, I. (2007). Critique of Pure Reason. London: Palgrave Macmillan,

Kostytskyi, M.V., & Kushakova-Kostytska, N.V. (2021). On hierarchy and interaction in the system "people - civil society - state". Interaction of civil society, individuals and the state: a vector of improvement: materials of the International. science and practice conf., dedicate. of the

th anniversary of the Constitution of Ukraine (pp. 17-20). Kyiv: Kyiv. rehion tsentr NAPrH Ukrainy.

Okyar, O. (1965). The Concept of Etatism. The Economic Journal, 75(297), 98-111. doi: 10.2307/2229238.

Petryshyn, O.V. (Eds.). (2017). Great Ukrainian legal encyclopedia (vol. 3). Kharkiv: Pravo.

Radbruh, G. (2011). Rechtsphilosophie. 2 überarbeitete Auflage. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.

Ryndiuk, V.I. (2019). Law-making as a type of legal activity: praxeological aspect. Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine "KPI", 4(44), 137-142. doi: 10.20535/2308-5053.2019.4(44).199747.

Sabbahy, L.K. (2020). Kingship, Power, and Legitimacy in Ancient Egypt. From the Old Kingdom to the Middle Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108914529.

Sánchez-Dorado, J. (2023). Creativity, pursuit and epistemic tradition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 100, 81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.003.

Schiølin, K.H. (2023). STS jurisprudence: exploring the intersection between science and technology studies and law. Research Handbook on Law and Technology. Cheltenham: Ejgar Publ. doi: 10.4337/9781803921327.00031.

Serdiuk, I.A. (2017). Methodological analysis of interpretations of the concept of "law-making". Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 2, 69-78.

Shemshuchenko, Yu.S. (Eds.). (2003). Legal encyclopedia (vol. 5). Kyiv: Ukr. Entsykl. im. M.P. Bazhanova.

Shynkaruk, V.I. (Eds.). (1986). Philosophical dictionary. Kyiv: Holov. red. URE.

Von Jhering, R. (1913). Law as a Means to an End. Boston: The Boston Book Company.

Von Jhering, R., Kocourek, A., & Lalor, J.J. (2019). The Struggle for Law. Creative Media Partners LLC.

Watkins, E. (2014). The early Schelling on the unconditioned. Interpreting Schelling. Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781139093569.003.

Zippelius, R. (2011). Rechtsphilosophie. 6 neubearbeitete Auflage. München: C.H. Beck.

Yushchyk, O. (2004). Theoretical foundations of the legislative process. Kyiv: Parlament. vyd-vo.


Abstract views: 34
PDF Downloads: 48
Published
2024-06-25
Section
Philosophy and philosophy of law