Economic and Legal Manifestation of the Declared Ownership of the Ukrainian People to the Main National Wealth

  • Oleksandr KOVALIV

    Doctor of Economic, Chief Researcher of the Institute of Agroecology and Environmental
    of the Management of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
    Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-7963
  • Vasyl SHAKUN

    Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Legal Sciences
    of Ukraine, Chief Researcher of the Public Legal Research Department of the Institute
    of Law-Making and Scientific-Legal Expertise of the National Academy of Sciences
    of Ukraine
    Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1757-8453

Abstract

Abstract. Due to the lack of a scientifically based and legally regulated economic and legal system of practical manifestation of the declared constitutional property rights of the Ukrainian people to the land and its natural resources as natural objects, which de jure are the main national wealth, as well as - the corresponding decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine regarding the official interpretation of the current norms of this law, in practice there are departmental-monopoly corruption-oligarchic schemes of appropriating the nation's capital. The purpose of the work is a systematic analysis and synthesis of the essence of the declared ownership right of the Ukrainian people to the land as the main national wealth and the adopted relevant Laws of Ukraine, which have an anti-constitutional flavor, and modeling of the algorithm for possible painless settlement of existing problems. For the first time, it was substantiated as an established fact that all citizens of Ukraine, who have a single citizenship, became de jure and de facto co-founders of an independent sovereign state and exclusive co-owners of the main national wealth located throughout the geospace of Ukraine within the internationally recognized state border. It has been established that the most significant paradox of the "state formation" of a unitary and indivisible state was the destructive introduction by the pro-communist majority of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of three forms of land ownership: "state", "private" and the imaginary "collective", which does not exist in any civilized country in the world, through the adoption of 30 of January 1992 of the Law of Ukraine "On Forms of Land Ownership". It has been proven that the so-called "land and agrarian reform" initiated on the basis of "collective ownership of land" is not deliberately introduced by the state authorities into the current constitutional field of Ukraine - until now, however, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the so-called Law on this basis in 2020 of Ukraine "on the circulation of agricultural land". It was discovered that the "legislators" changed articles 79 of the Civil Code and 373 of the Central Criminal Code of the constitutional norm regarding the right to "use" natural objects of the people's property rights, in other words "distribution". Reasoned ways of solving the existing anti-constitutional problems have important practical value, as they are related to the victory of the Ukrainian "constitutional land truth" on the "internal front" and are intended for the implementation, without waiting for the end of the war, of the legislative initiative of the President of Ukraine, people's deputies and the Government of Ukraine.

 

Keywords: Declaration on state sovereignty of Ukraine; constitutional land law; criminology; land reform; use; cognitive land economy; corruption; national wealth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr KOVALIV

Doctor of Economic, Chief Researcher of the Institute of Agroecology and Environmental
of the Management of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

Vasyl SHAKUN

Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Legal Sciences
of Ukraine, Chief Researcher of the Public Legal Research Department of the Institute
of Law-Making and Scientific-Legal Expertise of the National Academy of Sciences
of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. (1890). Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory. (William A. Smart, Trans). London: Macmillan.

Cagliero, R., Licciardo, F., & Legnini, M. (2021). The Evaluation Framework in the New CAP 2023-2027: A Refl ection in the Light of Lessons Learned from Rural. Development. Sustainability, 13(10). doi: 10.3390/su13105528.

Cagliero, R., Vassallo, M., Pierangeli, F., Pupo D'Andrea, M.R., Monteleone, A., Camaione, B., & Tarangioli, S. (2023). The Common Agricultural Policy 2023–2027. How do member states implement the new delivery model? Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 78(1), 49-66. doi: 10.36253/rea-14318.

Horbulin, V.P. (2020). How to defeat Russia in the war of the future. Bright Books.

Kachuriner, V. (2023). Legal regulation of the policy of the European Union in the field of agricultural production. The modern paradigm of public and private law in conditions of sustainable development (pp. 258-285). Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-331-6-13.

Kovaliv, O.I. (2016). Implementation of land reform in Ukraine: a new paradigm. Kyiv: DIA.

Kovaliv, O.I. (2021). "Cognitive land economy" - the main key to land reform in Ukraine as a new paradigm. Efficient economy, 6. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2021.6.8.

Kovaliv, O.I. (2021). Implementation of land reform in Ukraine according to the cognitive principle of positive time preference. Efficient economy, 11. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2021.11.22.

Kovaliv, O.I. (2024). Discourse on the state of scientific research on issues of land relations regulation in the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Balanced nature management, 1, 12-22. doi: 10.33730/2310-4678.1.2024.302615.

Kuznietsova, N.S., Onyshchenko, N.M., & Kot, O.O. (2020). Legal aspects of opening the land market in Ukraine. Environmental policy and law, 50(3), 279-287. doi: 10.3233/EPL-200224.

Kuznietsova, N.S., Petryshyn, O.V., & Pylypenko, D.S. (2021). The Civil Code of Ukraine is a reliable regulator of civil relations in civil society. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 10(1-2), 5-15.

Nosik, V. (2022). Protection of land ownership as the main national wealth of the Ukrainian people: challenges of martial law and problems of overcoming them. International legal assessment of Russian military aggression in Ukraine and protection of fundamental human rights: materials of International. science and practice conference (pp. 79-83). Kyiv: Liudmyla.

Onishchenko, N.M., Tarakhonych, T.I., & Bohinich, O.L. (2021). State as a participant in private law relations. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 10(1-2), 47-60. doi: 10.1163/2211906X-10010005.

Petryshyn, O.V., Kuznietsova, N.S., & Kot, O.O. (2020). Transformation of approaches to the individual's right to information in the course of European integration. Rivista di Studi Sulla Sostenibilita, 1, 423-440.

Pidorycheva, I. (2022). Postwar recovery of Europe: experience and lessons for Ukraine. Journal of European Economy, 21(2), 170-187. doi: 10.35774/jee2022.02.170.

Popova, O., & Pankratova, L. (2023). Green architecture of the EU SAP: guidelines for development during the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. Ukraine economy, 8, 78-96. doi: 10.15407/economyukr.2023.08.078.

Shakun, V.I., Heiets, V.M., & Borodina, O.M. (2022). Ensuring human rights in land legal relations: socio-economic and legal foundations. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 29(1), 59-69. doi: 10.37635/jnalsu.29(1).2022.59-69.


Abstract views: 9
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2024-12-23
Section
Philosophy and philosophy of law