State and Political Views in the Universalist System of Pythagoras’ Worldview

  • M. Kostytskyi

    Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-2513

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to introduce (or return) into scientific circulation information about the forgotten universal ancient thinker, philosopher and sage Pythagoras. He was the originator of European philosophy, science, culturology, musicology, and others. In the holistic teaching of the thinker it is necessary to highlight the state and political views that served as the basis for their development by other ancient philosophers and sages. The methodological basis of the content of this article is mathematical and logical methodology (see my articles in the journals «Philosophical and methodological problems of law» № 12 for 2013 and № 1 for 2014, «Legal psychology and pedagogy»№ 1 (15) for 2014). The scientific novelty is that the author for the first time sees the teachings and worldview of Pythagoras as a whole (not even a mosaic) in which the statesmanship and political views of the thinker are inextricably represented. Domestic and foreign scholars ignore the figure of Pythagoras and his teachings in silence or in a few sentences (sometimes pages). An exception is the monograph and scientific articles of my student Professor Serhiy Melenko. Conclusions: I believe that the legacy of Pythagoras should be studied holistically (or at least comprehensively) and return this name to the history of philosophy, the history of philosophy of law, the history of science in general.

Keywords: Pythagoras; pythagorean community; acoumatics; mathematics; cosmology; soul; pythagorean ethics; state; political system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

M. Kostytskyi

Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Logic of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Аристотель. Сочинения в четырех томах. М. : Мысль, 1976. Т. 1. 550 с.

Блаватская Е. Тайная доктрина: Эзотерическое учение : в 2 кн. / пер. с англ. М. : АСТ, 2003. Кн. 1. 397 с.

Будко В. В. Философия науки : учеб. пособие. Харьков : Консум, 2005. 268 с.

Чумаченко Б. М. Вступ до культурології античності. Стародавня Греція : навч. посіб. Київ : Академія, 2003. 100 с.

Гегель Г. В. Ф. Лекции по истории философии. СПб. : Наука, 1993. Кн. 1. 350 с.

Гокінґ С. Теорія всього : зб. лекцій. Харків : Клуб сімейного дозвілля, 2019. 160 с. doi: http://doi.org/10.11.19/1.48.65548.

Kaufman A. Rechtphilosophis. München : C. H. Becrʼsche Velagsbuchhandlung, 1997. 365 р.

Kerferd G. B. What can we Know of Pythagoras? C. J. de Vogel: Pythagoras and Early Pythagoreanism: an interpretation of neglected evidence of the philosopher Pythagoras. P. 323 ; 6 plates. Assen : Van Gorcum, 1966. Cloth, fl. 28.50. The Classical Review. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X0032755X.

Лаэртский Д. О жизни, учениях и изречениях знаменитых философов. М. : Мысль, 1979. 620 с.

Фрагменты ранних греческих философов / под ред. А. В. Лебедев. М. : Наука, 1989. Ч. І. 576 с.

MacRis C. Pythagoras. The History of Western Philosophy of Religion / Ed. By G. Oppy. London : Acumen Publishing, 2013. P. 23–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654635.003.

O’Meara D. J. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford : Oxford Scholarship Online, 2004. URL: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198239130.001.0001/acprof-9780198239130. doi: 10.1093/0198239130.001.0001.

Овчинников Н. Ф. Тенденция к единству науки. М. : Наука, 1988. 272 с.

Пифагор. Золотой канон. Фигуры эзотерики. М. : ЭКСМО-Пресс, 2001. 448 с.

Пифагор, Эпиктет. Пифагоровы законы и нравственные правила. Афоризмы этикета. М. : Олма-Пресс ; СПб. : Нева ; Скриптириум, 2000. 384 с.

Popkin R. H., Stroll A. Filozofia. Poznan : Zysa i S-ra Wudawnictwo, 1994. 528 р.

Radbruch G. Rechtsphilosophic. Heidelberg : C. F. Müller, 1999. 278 p.

Редкин П. Г. Из лекций по истории философии права в связи с историей философии вообще : в 7 т. СПб. : М. М. Стасюлевич, 1889. Т. 2. 403 с.

Doctrine and Doxography. Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras / Ed. By D. Sider, D. Obbink. Berlin : De Gruyter, 2013. 349 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331370.

Slipro T. Sy Zarys etuki ogolney. Krakow : Wudawnictwo Wam, 2009. 455 р.

Вернадський В. Наукова думка як планетарне явище. Український культурологічний альманах. 2004. Вип. 57–58. 824 с.

Юркевич П. Історія філософії права. Філософія права. Філософський щоденник. Київ : Укр. світ, 1999. 756 с.

Zhmud L. What is Pythagorean in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature? Philologus. 2018. Vol. 163. Issue 1. P. 72–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0003.


Abstract views: 314
PDF Downloads: 608
Published
2020-10-26
Section
Philosophical problems of particular branches of law studies